Reality Check: Is Newt Gingrich right about power to assassinate - Cincinnati News, Weather, Sports from FOX19 NOW-WXIX

Reality Check: Is Newt Gingrich right about the president's power to assassinate?

Newt Gingrich not only answered the question in length but he did so with a swagger that indicated the answer is simple and obvious. 

I am going to look at three different statements Gingrich made but there is so much information, we are breaking this into 2 parts.  Tonight part 1, is Gingrich right about the specific case of Anwar al-Alwaki?

Let's begin with who Anwar al-Awlaki was.  Al-Alwlaki was a Muslim cleric in Yemen.  The U.S. government had said he was responsible for influencing the Fort Hood shooter, and the unsuccessful Christmas Day underwear bomber, as well as the failed Times Square bomber.  On September 30th of this year, al-Awlaki was killed by drone strike.    

What is critical to this story, is that al-Awalki was a U.S. citizen, born in Las Cruces, New Mexico.   

Two weeks after his assassination, a separate drone attack was used to kill his 16 year-old son, Abdulrahman al-Awlaki.  The 16-year-old, was at a family bbq.  He was also a U.S. citizen, born in Denver, Colorado.  

So, the question...   

"As President of the United States, would you sign a death warrant for an American citizen overseas who you believe is a terrorist suspect?"  asked anchor Scott Pelley of CBS News. 

Gingrich answered, "Well, he is not a terrorist suspect.  He was a person who was found guilty under review as a person seeking the death of Americans"

Pelly fired back, "Not found guilty by a court sir." 

Gingrich replied "He was found guilty by a panel who looked at it and reported to the President." 

That is not true.  

At least not to the extent that has been either made public by the administration or in the context of leaked information.  Here is what we do know, There wasn't a panel that determined al-Alwaki's guilt.  There is a roughly 50-page memorandum by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, completed around June, 2010.   

That memo was writte not  by a panel but by two lawyers, David Barron and Martin Lederman.  The legal analysis, those two lawyers provided concluded that mr. al-Awlaki could be legally killed, if it was not feasible to capture him, because intelligence agencies said he was taking part in the war between the United States and al Qaeda and posed a significant threat to Americans. 

So on the first issue, there was not a legal panel that determined al-Awlaki could be killed, just two lawyers.  But there is more.

The memorandum written by those two lawyers was written more than a year before al- Awlaki was killed.  According to the Washington Post, who was leaked the memo, it did not independently analyze the quality of the evidence against him.  The Post goes on to say there is no evidence that a "review" took place that found al-Awlaki "guilty" in any meaningful constitutional or legal sense.

So what you need to know… even if Gingrich had been right,  there are a lot of American's who would say he was still wrong because the Constitution does not grant the President the authority to assassinate any citizen.

The Constitution however, does deal with this issue, citizens who wage war against the nation.  It is called treason.  It carries a death penalty but Article 3 states that "No person shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession."

And all of that happens in open court.

That is Reality Check.

Copyright 2012 WXIX.  All rights reserved.

  • FOX19 HeadlinesMore>>

  • 'Quiet revolution' leads to abortion rights win in Ireland

    'Quiet revolution' leads to abortion rights win in Ireland

    Saturday, May 26 2018 2:43 AM EDT2018-05-26 06:43:19 GMT
    Sunday, May 27 2018 12:55 AM EDT2018-05-27 04:55:05 GMT
    (Niall Carson/PA via AP). A man walks past a mural showing Savita Halappanavar, a 31-year-old Indian dentist who had sought and been denied an abortion before she died after a miscarriage in a Galway hospital, with the word YES over it, in Dublin, Irel...(Niall Carson/PA via AP). A man walks past a mural showing Savita Halappanavar, a 31-year-old Indian dentist who had sought and been denied an abortion before she died after a miscarriage in a Galway hospital, with the word YES over it, in Dublin, Irel...
    Official counting is set to begin in Ireland's historic abortion rights referendum, with two exit polls predicting an overwhelming victory for those seeking to end the country's strict ban.Full Story >
    Official counting is set to begin in Ireland's historic abortion rights referendum, with two exit polls predicting an overwhelming victory for those seeking to end the country's strict ban.Full Story >
  • Seoul: North Korea committed to US summit, denuclearization

    Seoul: North Korea committed to US summit, denuclearization

    Saturday, May 26 2018 9:23 PM EDT2018-05-27 01:23:54 GMT
    Sunday, May 27 2018 12:54 AM EDT2018-05-27 04:54:30 GMT
    (South Korea Presidential Blue House/Yonhap via AP). In this May 26, 2018 photo provided on May 27, 2018, by South Korea Presidential Blue House via Yonhap News Agency, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, center left, and South Korean President Moon Jae-i...(South Korea Presidential Blue House/Yonhap via AP). In this May 26, 2018 photo provided on May 27, 2018, by South Korea Presidential Blue House via Yonhap News Agency, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, center left, and South Korean President Moon Jae-i...

    At the White House, President Trump said negotiations over a potential June 12 summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un that he had earlier canceled are "going along very well." 

    Full Story >

    At the White House, President Trump said negotiations over a potential June 12 summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un that he had earlier canceled are "going along very well." 

    Full Story >
  • More LGBT issues loom as justices near wedding cake decision

    More LGBT issues loom as justices near wedding cake decision

    Saturday, May 26 2018 9:33 AM EDT2018-05-26 13:33:35 GMT
    Sunday, May 27 2018 1:04 AM EDT2018-05-27 05:04:37 GMT
    (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File). FILE - In this Oct. 10, 2017, file photo, the Supreme Court in Washington is seen at sunset. A flood of lawsuits over LGBT rights is making its way through the courts and will continue, no matter the outcome in the...(AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File). FILE - In this Oct. 10, 2017, file photo, the Supreme Court in Washington is seen at sunset. A flood of lawsuits over LGBT rights is making its way through the courts and will continue, no matter the outcome in the...

    A flood of lawsuits over LGBT rights is making its way through courts and that'll continue, no matter what the Supreme Court decides in the case of a baker who wouldn't create a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.

    Full Story >

    A flood of lawsuits over LGBT rights is making its way through courts and that'll continue, no matter what the Supreme Court decides in the case of a baker who wouldn't create a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.

    Full Story >
Powered by Frankly